Azacitidine in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: An Effective and Manageable Approach

Andrea Tendas, Luca Cupelli, Agostina Siniscalchi, Laura Scaramucci, Marco Giovannini, Teresa Dentamaro, Alessio Perrotti, Tommaso Caravita, Paolo de Fabritiis and Pasquale Niscola

Hematology Division, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Corresponding author: Pasquale Niscola M.D., Hematology Unit, S. Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy. Tel:+390651003241, Fax:+390651002390. E-mail: pniscola@gmail.com

Published: February 16, 2014
Received: August 30, 2013
Accepted: January 29, 2014
Meditter J Hematol Infect Dis 2014, 6(1): e2014020, DOI 10.4084/MJHID.2014.020
This article is available on PDF format at:

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is an uncommon neoplastic hematological disorder, typically affecting the elderly and characterized by a marked clinical heterogeneity and a remarkable propensity for transformation into acute myeloid leukemia. Hypomethylating agents represent the most innovative management approach in this difficult setting. At our institution, between 2010 and 2012, we have treated with azacitidine 10 CMML patients with a median age of 75 (62–86) years. The overall response rate of 70% was achieved without remarkable toxicities; in particular, most therapy-induced side effects were managed on outpatient basis. With a median follow-up of 12,5 (2–27) months, 6 patients are alive, and 4 of them continue to receive the treatment; the median survival from the start of therapy was not reached. In conclusion, also in the light of our encouraging experience, azacitidine can offer new chances of treatment also in the difficult setting of elderly CMML.

Introduction

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is an uncommon neoplastic hematological disorder, typically affecting the elderly and characterized by marked clinical heterogeneity and remarkable propensity for transformation into acute myeloid leukemia (AML).[1] Although CMML portrays a worse outcome when compared to myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS),[2] it shares several features similar to MDS.[1,2] In particular, affected patients usually are elderly and may present with  frailty, comorbidities,[3] and several forms of disability,[4] being all factors hampering in most cases the access to aggressive treatment approaches, such as allogeneic hemopoietic stem cells transplantation (HSCT), which still remains the only potentially curative measure in this setting,[1,4] However, the potential disease-modifying activity of hypomethylating agents, such as azacitidine and decitabine, has been recently reported and nowadays these agents represent the most innovative management approach in suitable CMML patients.[1]

Patients and Methods

At our institution, between 2010 and 2012, we have treated with azacitidine 10 CMML patients (6 males) with a median age of 75 (62–86) years. According to WHO 2008 criteria,[5] 6, 2 and 2 patients had CMML-2, CMML-1 and AML progressed from CMML respectively. Four patients had proliferative CMML (MPR-CMML) whereas the remaining six presented myelodysplastic CMML (MD-CMML); 2 out of 10 patients had an abnormal karyotype (46, XY, Inv12 and 45, X,-Y, respectively). Details are reported on Table 1. Two patients had secondary likely therapy-related CMML; the first has undergone radio-chemotherapy for a solid tumor 3 years before[6] whereas the second was an unusual case of aggressive CMML transformed from a 7- years lasting MDS (refractory anemia)[7]. The median time from the diagnosis to the start of azacitidine was 3 (1-21) months. Prior therapies included cytoreductive therapy and erythroid stimulating agents; 4 patients were transfusion dependent at some time point of disease course before starting azacitidine. At the time of treatment, the M.D. Anderson Prognostic Scoring System (MDAPS)[8] was low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2 and high in 1, 2, 4 and 1 CMML patients, respectively. Criteria for initiation of azacitidine were represented by aggressive disease features, such as splenomegaly, transfusion dependence, cytopenia- related syndromes (bleeding and recurrent infections), an increasing number of peripheral and/or bone marrow blasts, and by patient’s symptomatology, such as general malaise, weight loss. In particular, 2 patients with MPR-CMML-2 were treated because of high bone marrow blasts count  (16-19%), 1 patient with MPR-CMML-1 presented severely symptomatic thrombocytopenia and 1 patient with MD-CMML-1 presented severe neutropenia. After written consent had been obtained, all patients received azacitidine (75 mg/m2 x 7 days, 5+2+2 schedule, every four weeks, subcutaneously). In MPR-CMML patients undergoing cytoreductive treatment, hydroxyurea was discontinued at the moment of azacitidine start; no cytoreduction was added during treatment and at response assessment. Supportive care was given as required. Bone marrow response was assessed in 9 patients (following the sixth cycle in 6 patients and the fourth in 3); response was not assessed in 1 patient, due to early sudden death (multi-organ failure), which occurred after the second cycle. Responses were classified according to the modified IWG response criteria in myelodysplasia[9] for MD-CMML and IWG consensus criteria for treatment response in myelofibrosis[10] for MPR-CMML.


Table 1Table 1. Patients’ series details (diagnosis, treatment response and follow-up data).


Results

Out of 9 evaluable patients, 4 (44.4%) patients achieved complete remission (CR) and 3 (33.3%) partial remissions (PR) with an overall response rate (ORR) of 77.7%; 2 (22, 3%) patients maintained a stable disease. At the time of writing (August 2013), the median follow-up was of 12.5 (2 – 27) months; 6 (66,6%) out of 9 evaluable patients were alive, and 4 of them were on azacitidine. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Responding patients continued the treatment up to disease progression or intolerance. Two (22.3%) out of 9 CMML patients progressed to AML following the sixth and the fourteenth cycle respectively, after having obtained a CR. Overall, 4 (40%) out of 10 patients initially treated with azacitidine have deceased: 2, 1 and 1 because of AML progression, multi-organ failure (before response assessment) and sudden cardiac death (being the patient with stable CMML). Treatment outcome was similar in MPR-CMML, when compared with MD-CMML; intermediate-2 / high MDAPS CMML and AML patients exhibited a better response rate (CR in 4 and PR in 2 patients, respectively), when compared with low / intermediate-1 MDAPS CMML patients (PR in 1 and stable disease in 2 patients, respectively); treatment outcome details are reported on Table 1. Treatment was well-tolerated, and no remarkable side effects directly attributable to the agent were recorded; in particular, no hospitalization was needed for treatment complications and all of them were managed in the ambulatory setting.

Conclusion

Our experience was encouraging, mainly due to the following reasons.
Firstly, the use of azacitidine in our hands achieved good responses in 70% of the treated patients, similar to response rate reported in the literature;[11-13] furthermore this result was obtained in  high risk patients with unfavorable prognostic profile.
Secondly, this agent was particularly safe and manageable in our experience, and then can be offered also to very old patients.[13]
In conclusion, CMML is a rare disorder and thus there is a paucity of randomized trials utilizing different agents. Until now, most of these patients have received only palliative cytoreduction, being very few of them eligible for more aggressive treatments, such as HSCT. In this view, we have reported a real life experience regarding a little series of CMML patients treated outside a clinical trial. Our experience adds further data to the scanty and scarce evidences supporting the effective activity and the significant benefits provided by azacitidine in this setting. Although our not controlled experience was limited to a small group of patients, our results are encouraging and confirmed previously published papers which reported the possibility of CR with an ORR ranging from 39% to 60% and a median OS from 12 to 37 months.[12-13] Thus, this agent can offer new chances of treatment also in the difficult setting of elderly CMML patients.

References

  1. Parikh SA, Tefferi A. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2012 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2012 Jun; 87(6):610-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.23203 
  2. Zandberg DP, Huang TY, Ke X, Baer MR, Gore SD, Smith SW, Davidoff AJ. Treatment and outcomes for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia compared to myelodysplastic syndromes in older adults. Haematologica. 2013 Apr; 98(4):584-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2012.062547   
  3. Tendas A, Niscola P, Ales M, Baraldi L, Boschetto C, Caiazza E, Cupelli L, Giovannini M, Scaramucci L, Brunetti G, Cartoni C, Mandelli F, de Fabritiis P. Disability and physical rehabilitation in patients with advanced hematological malignancies followed in a home care program. Support Care Cancer. 2009 Dec; 17(12):1559-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0732-1   
  4. Eissa H, Gooley TA, Sorror ML, Nguyen F, Scott BL, Doney K, Loeb KR, Martin PJ, Pagel JM, Radich JP, Sandmaier BM, Warren EH, Storb R, Appelbaum FR, Deeg HJ. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: relapse-free survival is determined by karyotype and comorbidities. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 Jun; 17(6):908-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.09.018 
  5. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, Harris NL, Le Beau MM, Hellström-Lindberg E, Tefferi A, Bloomfield CD. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009 Jul 30; 114(5):937-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262     
  6. Niscola P, Catalano G, Tendas A, Giovannini M, Scaramucci L, Neri B, Morino L, Piccioni D, Fratoni S, Perrotti A, de Fabritiis P. Complex and multifaceted therapy-related myeloid neoplasm following laryngeal cancer treated with Cisplatin and radiotherapy. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2013 Apr 15; 5(1):e2013030. http://dx.doi.org/10.4084/mjhid.2013.030  
  7. Niscola P, Tendas A, Scaramucci L, Giovannini M, Fratoni S, de Fabritiis P. Evolution of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia from refractory anemia: the unusual course of a myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood Res. 2013 Jun; 48(2):152-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.5045/br.2013.48.2.152   
  8. Onida F, Kantarjian HM, Smith TL, Ball G, Keating MJ, Estey EH, Glassman AB, Albitar M, Kwari MI, Beran M. Prognostic factors and scoring systems in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a retrospective analysis of 213 patients. Blood. 2002 Feb 1; 99(3):840-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.V99.3.840   
  9. Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, Lowenberg B, Wijermans PW, Nimer SD, Pinto A, Beran M, de Witte TM, Stone RM, Mittelman M, Sanz GF, Gore SD, Schiffer CA, Kantarjian H. Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood. 2006 Jul 15; 108(2):419-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-10-4149  
  10. Tefferi A, Barosi G, Mesa RA, Cervantes F, Deeg HJ, Reilly JT, Verstovsek S, Dupriez B, Silver RT, Odenike O, Cortes J, Wadleigh M, Solberg LA Jr, Camoriano JK, Gisslinger H, Noel P, Thiele J, Vardiman JW, Hoffman R, Cross NC, Gilliland DG, Kantarjian H. IWG for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT). International Working Group (IWG) consensus criteria for treatment response in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia, for the IWG for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT). Blood. 2006 Sep 1; 108(5):1497-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-03-009746    
  11. Costa R, Abdulhaq H, Haq B, Shadduck RK, Latsko J, Zenati M, Atem FD, Rossetti JM, Sahovic EA, Lister J. Activity of azacitidine in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Cancer. 2011 Jun 15; 117(12):2690-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25759   
  12. Fianchi L, Criscuolo M, Breccia M, Maurillo L, Salvi F, Musto P, Mansueto G, Gaidano G, Finelli C, Aloe-Spiriti A, Santini V, Greco M, Hohaus S, Leone G, Voso MT. High rate of remissions in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia treated with 5-azacytidine: results of an Italian retrospective study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013 Mar; 54(3):658-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2012.719617 
  13. Breccia M, Voso MT, Alimena G. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia treatment with azacitidine: what have we learned so far? Leuk Res. 2013 Feb; 37(2):204-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2012.10.023    
  14. Niscola P, Palombi M, Trawinska MM, Tendas A, Giovannini M, Scaramucci L, Perrotti A, de Fabritiis P. Managing myelodysplastic syndromes in very old patients: a teaching case report. Clin Interv Aging. 2013; 8:391-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S39536 

[TOP]