Ultrasound as First Line Step in Anaemia Diagnostics

Chiara Mozzini1*,  Giancarlo Pesce2, Alder Casadei3, Domenico Girelli1 and Maurizio Soresi4.

1 Department of Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134 Verona, Italy.
2 Sorbonne Universitè INSERM UMR-S1136 Institut Pierre Louis d’ Epidemiologie et de Sanitè Publique, Team EPAR F75012, Paris, France.
3 Ultrasound Association of South-Tyrol, Bolzano Health District, Piazza W.A. Loew-Cadonna 12, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
4 Department of Health Promotion Sciences Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, 141-90127 Palermo, Italy.

Correspondence to: Chiara Mozzini. Department of Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10,37134 Verona, Italy. E-mail: chiaramozzini@libero.it

Published: November 1, 2019
Received: September 25, 2019
Accepted: October 17, 2019
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2019, 11(1): e2019066 DOI 10.4084/MJHID.2019.066

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


This review covers the role of ultrasonography as an essential non-invasive diagnostic approach when facing patients with anaemia, a common clinical problem. Abdomen ultrasound is well recognised as a first-line examination in the setting of blood loss, both acute and chronic. Less is clear about the additional opportunities, given by ultrasound in anaemia, due to the many other possible causes.
Here we provide information on the utility of ultrasound in different contexts and a practical guide for clinicians facing anaemic patients.  


Anaemia is the most common haematological disorder, affecting more than two billions people worldwide, with iron deficiency being the prevalent cause.[1] According to the World Health Organization, anaemia is defined by haemoglobin levels less than 13 g/dL in adult males, and less than 12 g/dL in adult females.[1] Anaemia is classified in several ways, e.g., acute versus chronic and/or according to the leading cause, as detailed elsewhere.[2-5] Ultrasonography, a widely and increasingly used non-invasive diagnostic approach, can be very useful also in patients with anaemia. The aim of this paper is to review the role of ultrasound in different conditions, eventually providing a practical guide for clinicians facing anaemic patients. A large emphasis is given to the elderly, as well as to patients with cancer or other chronic diseases, in whom anaemia is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes, and non-invasive approaches are often preferred because of their fragile conditions. The possible applications of ultrasonography in anaemic patients are depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Figure 1. Ultrasound in the anaemic patients: fields of application.

Abdomen Ultrasound: the First Line Examination in Different Clinical Settings

Abdomen ultrasound may be the first-line examination in different settings, as summarised in Figure 2.

Figure 2 Figure 2. The role of abdomen ultrasound as a first-line examination in different settings and with different patients.

General Practitioners (GPs) usually represent the first contact with the healthcare system for patients with chronic anaemia, especially when it is due to iron-deficiency, which in turn tends to be underdiagnosed and/or under-coded.[6-8] In this setting, an appropriate first-line examination aimed not only at the diagnosis of iron deficiency per se but also addressing its possible aetiology, is crucial. Indeed, point-of-care abdomen ultrasound could detect gross alterations (e.g. abdominal masses) guiding further investigation.
Anaemia due to acute blood loss in the Emergency Department. In the setting of acute bleeding, ultrasound has a prominent role. For example, in patients referring because of trauma, ultrasound represents a useful complement to basic clinical evaluation, influencing bedside decision making, and determining whether or not the patient requires further procedural intervention. Of note, in as many as 50% of patients with severe abdominal trauma, the initial physical examination can appear normal, leading to dangerous reassurance. Similarly, unconscious patients or those unable to provide a clear history of the trauma whatever the reason, can be particularly difficult to manage. Thus, physicians largely depend on diagnostic imaging, so that ultrasound represents an essential tool in the trauma resuscitation area. In this setting, the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) evaluation can be of crucial help for the rapid identification of the presence of free fluid suggestive for hemoperitoneum, hemothorax, and/or hemopericardium.[9] The overarching assumption of FAST is that all clinically significant abdominal injuries are associated with hemoperitoneum. The traditional FAST approach includes four basic sonographic views: pericardial, perihepatic, perisplenic and pelvic. The detailed procedure is well described.[10] Ultrasound can easily detect as little as 200 mL of fluid in the Morrison pouch. This technique can be completed in less than one minute. Nevertheless, FAST has a number of limitations, especially in penetrating trauma, as well as in detecting small retroperitoneal bleeding. Thus, computed tomography (CT) remains the gold-standard technique.
Understanding the strengths and limitations of FAST is essential to recognise when further testing is indicated. It has been reported that FAST contributes to a decrease in abdominal CT use by about 50%.[11]
The algorithm for FAST-oriented further investigations is described in Figure 3 and is influenced by patient’s hemodynamic status.

Figure 3 Figure 3. FAST-oriented algorithm in the abdominal trauma. FAST: Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma; CT: computed tomography.

Ultrasound has been suggested as a useful non-invasive tool for the early detection of bleeding also in non-traumatic settings. Two well recognised sonographic markers of hypovolemia are the diameter of the inferior cave vein (DICV) and the thickness of the left ventricle. Several studies[12,13] have highlighted the correlation between DICV and the need for blood transfusions in patients with acute bleeding.[14]
Moreover, serial changes in DICV reliably predict ongoing hemorrhagic shock, even better than arterial pressure or heart rate.[15] Pseudo-hypertrophy of the left ventricle has been reported as another possible non-invasive early marker for hemorrhagic shock in experimental animal models.[13,16]
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. GI bleeding is a common problem in the Emergency Department. Hemodynamic monitoring by ultrasound of the inferior cave vein (inspiratory collapse) and the so-called “kissing sign” of the left ventricle are useful markers of high risk in emergency GI bleeding.[17]
Acute or overt GI bleeding can be easily recognised when hematemesis, melena, or hematochezia are present, while chronic or occult GI bleeding often leading to iron-deficiency anaemia can be detected by a positive faecal occult blood test. Upper endoscopy and colonoscopy are the mainstays of the investigations. Angiography, radionuclide imaging, capsule endoscopy, and deep enteroscopy are further options to investigate acute GI bleeding and obscure GI bleeding, respectively.[18]
In the elderly, nutrient deficiency (in particular of iron, folate, and B12 vitamin) accounts for at least one-third of all cases of anaemia. Within this group, more than half is related to absolute iron deficiency.[3,4] The so-called anaemia of chronic diseases (in particular cardiovascular, kidney, and inflammatory diseases including cancer), is present in near another third of the anaemic elderly.[19,20] Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of anaemia in the elderly remains apparently unexplained. In hospitalised elderly patients, anaemia is present in up to near 50% and is independently associated with increased length of in-hospital stay, in-hospital readmission, and mortality.[21-23]
Ultrasound has a minimal role in the diagnosis of gastric bleeding, where endoscopy represents the gold standard. On the other hand, ultrasound can be helpful in intestinal diseases. Conventional ultrasound can provide quick information about bowel status and helps in the choice of adequate further examinations. However, it is worthy of note that negative findings do not exclude the presence of bowel disease. Two types of probes with different ultrasound frequencies may be used (3.5-5 MHz and 5-17 MHz) to obtain a panoramic view of the abdomen. The five layers of the colonic wall may be clearly distinguishable as concentric rings of alternating echogenicity. The measurement of wall thickness (normal value < 3 mm) is essential.[24]
More recent ultrasound techniques, as elastography, contrast-enhanced, and Doppler ultrasound, rectal and trans-perineal ultrasonography allow further examinations, in particular, to evaluate bowel vascularisation abnormalities.[25]
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Anaemia is among the most frequent manifestations of IBD. Its prevalence is around 24% and can be due to chronic inflammation, chronic blood loss, or both.[26] The European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) guidelines indicate intestinal ultrasonography as the imaging technique of choice for screening patients with clinically suspected Crohn's disease.[26] Nevertheless, intestinal ultrasound is particularly important in the follow-up of patients after the initial diagnosis, where fluctuations in disease course require repeated examinations.[27] The ultrasonographic signs usually detected in Crohn’s disease are well characterised,[27] and include thickening, decreased compressibility, and increased vascularisation of the bowel wall. Pericolic fluid and lymph node enlargement may be detected with high sensitivity and specificity.[28] Also abscesses narrowing the bowel lumen, fistulas in the intestinal loops, and cutaneous fistulas may be detected.[28] The assessment of the disease activity and the precise overview of Crohn’s extraluminal complications is beyond the scope of conventional abdomen ultrasound. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance enterography is the method of choice.[29,30] The use of colour Doppler, contrast ultrasound and elastography increases the accuracy of the conventional ultrasound, when magnetic resonance is not available.[31] In particular, Doppler ultrasound may show bowel wall increased vascularisation due to inflammation. Elastography techniques, such as strain and shear wave elastography, have shown promising results, because of their ability to differentiate active inflammation from fibrosis. A comprehensive review of the current evidence supporting the use of elastography techniques in intestinal disorders is reported elsewhere.[32]
Cross-sectional imaging should be considered where conventional ultrasound is inconclusive or non-diagnostic or when it appears normal, but there is still high clinical suspicion of disease.
Cancer: focus on colorectal cancer and gastro-intestinal lymphoma. Anaemia is frequent in cancer patients and often characterised by multifactorial pathophysiology.[20]  Blood losses (either by tumour mass or associated with surgery), and inadequate nutrient intake due to cachexia or malnutrition are often present, along with inflammation mainly due to the release of cancer-associated pro-inflammatory cytokines. Such cytokines, especially interleukin-6, increase in turn hepcidin synthesis in the liver, eventually leading to iron sequestration into macrophages and functional iron deficiency.[34,35] Anaemia in cancer patients can also be due to decreased red cell survival, erythropoiesis disorders, low erythropoietin levels and progressive erythropoietin resistance of erythroid progenitors.[33]
Bone marrow infiltration by neoplastic cells, myelosuppression due to chemo- or radiotherapy, and possibly concomitant kidney disease also contribute to anaemia in individual cancer patients.
The role of conventional abdomen ultrasound is negligible as compared to endoscopy. Nevertheless, it often represents the first-line examination, when the disease is suspected, or endoscopy is not unfeasible.
Hypoechoic bowel wall thickening with irregular contour, loss of stratification of the wall layers, and the absence of normal peristalsis can be suggestive of malignancy (the so-called “pseudo-kidney sign”), as well as the detection of liver lesions suggesting metastasis from colorectal cancer.[36] Martinez-Ares and colleagues[36] evaluated the diagnostic performance of abdomen ultrasonography in 145 patients with suspected colorectal carcinoma who were admitted for colonoscopy. They concluded that abdominal ultrasound is a technique with high sensibility and specificity to detect colon cancer, in accordance with other authors.[37] High specificity and sensibility have been reported in the diagnosis of tumours located above the recto-sigmoid junction, but small polypoid lesions can be overlooked. Due to its non-invasiveness, abdominal ultrasound should be considered as an alternative to the conventional radiological and endoscopic examinations, especially in patients for which no therapeutic option would be possible because of comorbidities or advanced age. For other patients with suspected cancer, abdomen ultrasound should be the first diagnostic examination that may justify further endoscopic examinations also in the Emergency Department.
Gastrointestinal lymphoma is the second more frequent extra-nodal lymphoproliferative disorder. The clinical presentation is non-specific, including weight loss, dyspepsia, abdominal pain, and also anaemia. With the exception of relatively indolent gastric localisation, it usually has a high degree of malignancy.[38]
Over 77% of GI lymphoma exceeds 5 cm in diameter, and the average length of the affected bowel is 12 cm.[38] Abdominal ultrasound is the first-line examination to address the right diagnosis, followed by CT and endoscopy. In small bowel lymphoma, ultrasonography usually shows a bulky, lobulated, predominantly hypoechoic mass with a central echogenic component. Enlarged mesenteric and peri-aortic lymph nodes may also be detected.[38] In IBD, especially in patients with Crohn's diseases on immunosuppressive treatment, the worsening of anaemia may herald the evolution towards a lymphoproliferative disease.[39] In such cases, changes in the size, morphology, echogenicity or the appearance of abdominal lymph nodes may be useful in confirming/ruling out the suspected diagnosis.
Other causes of anaemia in the gastrointestinal tract. In addition to acute/overt bleeding, anaemia in gastrointestinal diseases may result from other causes: obscure bleeding, malabsorption, and maldigestion (e.g. celiac disease, chronic pancreatitis), or autoimmune disorder (e.g. pernicious anaemia).[40] The role of intestinal ultrasound in this clinical setting is not entirely defined. Recent guidelines issued by the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO), and by the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (SIGENP) do not recommend intestinal ultrasound, suggesting other imaging techniques like CT, enterography, magnetic resonance enterography, capsule enteroscopy, and endoscopy.[40]
However, abdominal ultrasound can still play a role in diseases of the small bowel, as an initial and low-cost procedure to guide the successive diagnostic approaches. It should be underlined that one of the reasons for the controversies in including ultrasonography among the recommended techniques for exploring the intestinal/abdominal causes of anaemia may be related to its poor reproducibility. To overcome this limitation, the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) has recently published new guidelines intending to standardise the examination technique and to facilitate the correct training education of operators.[41]
Malabsorption and  Maldigestion Syndromes. One of the most frequent signs of malabsorption syndromes is anaemia, in particular, iron deficiency anaemia.[40] Indeed anaemia can be present in 12-69% of patients with celiac disease (CD). CD diagnosis is usually pursued by serology including  IgA anti-transglutaminase (anti-tTG IgA) and IgG-anti-deamidated gliadin peptides (anti-DGP IgG), and confirmed by histological documentation of flattening of the villi.[40] In CD patients, intestinal ultrasound examinations can reveal small bowel loops thickening, enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes, and free fluid within the bowel loops in 50-60% of cases.[42] The absence of dilated and/or thickened loops has a negative predictive value of 98% in excluding the diagnosis of  CD by intestinal ultrasound.[43]
In maldigestion due to pancreatic insufficiency, e.g., due to chronic pancreatitis, anaemia can be related to decreased iron absorption, chronic inflammation, and vitamin B12 deficiency. In patients with anaemia and clinical signs of maldigestion, ultrasound may detect a reduction in the size of the pancreas, irregular profiles, parenchymal calcifications, or dilated Wirsung duct with stones. All these signs lead to the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.[44]


Anaemia is commonly encountered in gynaecology/obstetrics practice.[45] Bleeding caused by adenomyosis, uterine fibroids, or endometrial hyperplasia frequently results in even severe iron-deficiency anaemia. Ultrasound is the main diagnostic tool also to assess the location and status of early pregnancy. Transvaginal ultrasound is the method of choice. Nevertheless, in several situations, as for women who decline transvaginal ultrasound, the trans-abdomen scan is the alternative option. In particular, uterine disorders causing acute bleeding include retained products of conception, uterine arterio-venous malformations, and fibroids. Adnexal disorders may also cause bleeding, including hemorrhagic ovarian cysts, and ectopic pregnancies.[46] A detailed description of such diseases is beyond the scope of this work. Comprehensive reviews on these topics can be found elsewhere.[47,48]

Focus on: Ultrasound for the Haematologist

Conventional ultrasound is the recommended imaging method for lymph node evaluation, with the advantages of high resolution, real-time evaluation, safety, and low costs.[49] Nevertheless, recent advances in ultrasound techniques, as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS), and real-time elastography, improves the evaluation accuracy for the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymph nodes. CE-EUS is also used for guiding fine needle aspiration. The differentiation of malignant versus benign lymph nodes by ultrasound traditionally relies on size and topographic distribution.[50] However, malignant lymph node infiltration can occur in up to 30% lymph nodes of less than 5 mm. The evaluation of shape and borders does not allow a definitive classification.[51] New ultrasound techniques provide additional information; for example, CEUS can give information about vascularisation and perfusion pattern. This technique identifies changes in vascular architecture and avascular areas of malignant infiltration. In summary, perfusion defects and centripetal non-homogeneous enhancement suggest lymph node infiltration by malignancy.[52] In lymphoma, CEUS patterns are highly variable, particularly regarding the vascular features.[52] Elastography is a non-invasive method in which the stiffness of the tissue is viewed as a colour map or shear wave velocity.[53] The details of these techniques are reported elsewhere.[53,54]
Abdomen ultrasound and lymph nodes conventional ultrasound usually constitute the initial diagnostic workup in haematological diseases as recently reviewed.[55] Figure 4 represents the possible instrumental examination flow chart for suspected hematologic diseases.

Figure 4 Figure 4. The instrumental examination flow chart for suspected haematologic diseases.

Focus on: Anaemia and Cardiac Ultrasound (Heart Failure and the Oncologic Patient)

HF is a clinical syndrome characterised by typical symptoms and signs caused by structural or functional cardiac abnormalities, resulting in a reduced cardiac output or elevated intra-cardiac pressures at rest or during stress.[56] The prevalence of HF is approximately 1–2% of the adult population in developed countries, rising to 10% among people >70 years of age, where it represents the leading cause of hospitalisation.[57] Anaemia is a common co-morbidity in HF patients, and it is associated with worse long-term outcomes.[58] In HF clinical trials and registries, the prevalence of anaemia ranges from 15% to 70% among hospitalised patients.[56,59] The physiologic response to anaemia is a compensatory increase in cardiac output in order to maintain adequate oxygen delivery, with a decrease in myocardial contractility when the haemoglobin level is below 7 g/dL.[60] Left ventricle hypertrophy and dilation have been observed in animal and human models of severe anaemia.[61] The mechanisms by which anaemia worsens HF outcome are not fully understood. They may be related to increased myocardial workload due to hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and pro-inflammatory alterations finally leading to left ventricle remodelling.[62]  Absolute or functional iron deficiency, inappropriate erythropoietin production, and depressed bone marrow function are common cofactors leading to anaemia in HF patients. Dysregulation of molecules involved in these pathways is critical for the transition from adaptive cardiac hypertrophy to cardiac remodelling, as represented in Figure 5.

Figure 5 Figure 5. The mechanisms that lead to HF in anaemic patient.

Echocardiographic alterations in anaemic patients have been studied, in particular, related to the left ventricle function.[63-66] The presence of anaemia is associated with diastolic dysfunction (alteration in peak mitral early diastolic, E velocity, and peak mitral late diastolic, A velocity, E/A ratio, which reflects the increase of left ventricular filling pressure), increased left ventricle mass index and diameter, increased left atrium volume index, and higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure estimated by tricuspid Doppler. The correction of anaemia often results in the improvement of echocardiographic parameters.[63-66]
Cardiac imaging, particularly trans-thoracic echocardiography, plays an essential role in the baseline assessment and serial follow- up of oncologic patients, in which anaemia is a common feature. This ultrasound technique is part of the relatively new discipline of cardio-oncology, intending to prevent and monitor cardiovascular complications resulting from cancer treatment.[67] Cardiotoxicity is defined as a decrease in left ventricle ejection fraction greater than 10% to a value of less than 53%, confirmed on repeated imaging at 2-3 weeks from the initial evaluation.[68] Current guidelines68 recommend a standardised cardio-oncology echocardiographic protocol with the description of traditional approach and the introduction of more advanced modalities, like the assessment of global longitudinal strain as an early a marker of left ventricle dysfunction.
The role of ultrasound in HF has been well established also in the routine assessment of non-oncologic patients.
Echocardiography has a prominent role, but other ultrasound techniques have been proposed for a complete evaluation, as recently proposed.[69] A five-step ultrasound examination (“ABCDE”) to evaluate and monitor HF patients may include the evaluations of the Ankle-brachial index (A), B-lines (B), the Carotid intima-media thickness (C), the Diameters of the abdominal aorta and of the inferior cave vein (D), and the Echocardiographic assessment of the ejection fraction (E). All these parameters may be helpful in bedside monitoring of recovery after acute heart decompensation, as well as for a global cardiovascular assessment tool in HF patients.[69]


Ultrasonography is a safe and effective imaging tool that has to be considered when facing patients with anaemia. Anaemia, especially in the elderly, is often multifactorial,[22] and defining the prominent cause(s) can be difficult. However, ultrasound may be a useful diagnostic method to address the right diagnosis.
Future challenges include standardisation of the training process for physicians (other than Radiologists) to ensure the appropriate use of this technology, and a structuring policy to promote its effectiveness.
Educational strategies for increasing competency on the point of care ultrasound (that is ultrasonography performed and interpreted by the clinician at the bedside) represent the goal of several ultrasound societies worldwide. Indeed, both EFSUMB and WFUMB (World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology) have developed periodically up-dated guidelines on the minimum training requirements that should be achieved at each level of practice in order to perform examinations according to the operator’s capacity (from point of care/focused ultrasound to conventional ultrasound and specialized application of the technique).[70]


  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. Vitamin and mineral nutrition system. Geneva WHO 2011
  2. Platt A, Eckman J Diagnosing anaemia. Rev Clin 2006;16(2):44-50
  3. Camaschella C Iron deficiency anaemia. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1832-1843 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1401038 PMid:25946282
  4. Camaschella C Iron deficiency Blood 2019;133(1):30-39 https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-05-815944 PMid:30401704
  5. Long B, Koyhman A Emergency medicine: evaluation and management of anaemia. Emerg Med Clin Am 2018;36:609-630 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2018.04.009 PMid:30037447
  6. Gikas A, Triantafillidis JK The role of primary care physicians in early diagnosis and treatment of chronic gastrointestinal diseases. Int J Gen Med 2014; 7:159-173 https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S58888 PMid:24648750 PMCid:PMC3958525
  7. Gandhi SJ, Hagens I, Nathan K, Hunter K, Roy S Prevalence, comorbidity and investigation of anaemia in the primary care office. J Clin Med Res 2017; 9:970-980 https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3221w PMid:29163729 PMCid:PMC5687900
  8. Levi M, Rosselli M, Simonetti M, Brignoli O, Cancian M et al Epidemiology of iron deficiency anaemia in four European countries: a population-based study in primary care. Eur J Haematol 2016; 97:583-593 https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.12776 PMid:27155295
  9. Scalea TM, Rodriguez A, Chiu YC, Brenneman FD, Fallon WF et al Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST): results from an international consensus conference. J Trauma 1999; 46:466-472 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199903000-00022 PMid:10088853
  10. Rozycki GS, Newman PG Surgeon-performed ultrasound for the assessment of abdominal injuries. Adv Surg 1999; 33:243-259
  11. Stengel D, Bauwens K, Rademaker G, Ekkernkamp A, Guthoff G Emergency ultrasound-based algorithms for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma. Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2013;7: CD004446 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004446.pub3
  12. Lyon M, Blaivas M, Brannam L Sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava as a marker of blood loss Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:45-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2004.01.004 PMid:15672337
  13. Di Segni E, Preisman S, Ohad DG Echocardiographic left ventricular remodelling and pseudohypertrophy as markers of hypovolemia. An experimental study on bleeding and volume repletion. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10:926-936 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-7317(97)80009-0
  14. YanagawaY, Nishi K, Sakamoto T, Okada Y Early diagnosis of hypovolemic shock by sonographic measurement of inferior vena cava in trauma patients. J Trauma 2005; 58:825-829 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000145085.42116.A7 PMid:15824662
  15. Yanagawa Y, Sakamoto T, Okada Y Hypovolemic shock evaluated by sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava during resuscitation in trauma patients J Trauma 2007;63:1245-1248 https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318068d72b PMid:18212645
  16. Carr BG, Dean AJ, Everett WW intensive bedside ultrasound (INBU) for volume assessment in the intensive care unit: a pilot study. J Trauma 2007; 63:495-500 https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31812e51e5 PMid:18073592
  17. Tung Chen Y, Blancas Gomez-Casero R, Quintana Diaz M, Diaz HB Inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava and the kissing ventricle sign: markers of poor prognosis in emergency gastrointestinal bleeding. Emergencias 2019;31:79-85
  18. Kim BSM, Li BT, Engel A, Samza JS, Clarke S Diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding: a practical guide for clinicians. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2014;15:467-478 https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v5.i4.467 PMid:25400991 PMCid:PMC4231512
  19. Guralnik JM, Eisenstaedt RS, Ferucci L, Klein HG, Woodman RC Prevalence of anaemia in persons 65 years older in the United States: evidence for a high rate of unexplained anaemia. Blood 2004:104:2263-2268 https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-05-1812 PMid:15238427
  20. Busti F, Marchi G, Ugolini S, Castagna A, Girelli D Anaemia and iron deficiency in cancer patients: role of iron replacement therapy. Pharmaceuticals 2018;11:94-108 https://doi.org/10.3390/ph11040094 PMid:30274354 PMCid:PMC6315653
  21. Nathavithrana RL Anaemia is highly prevalent among unselected internal medicine inpatients and is associated with increased mortality, earlier readmission and more prolonged hospital stay: an observational retrospective cohort study. Intern Med J 2014;42:683-691 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02566.x PMid:21790925
  22. Girelli D, Marchi G, Camaschella C Anemia in the elderly. HemaSphere 2018;2:pe40 https://doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000040
  23. Riva E, Colombo R, Moreo G, Mandelli S, Franchi C et al Prognostic value of degree and types of anaemia on clinical outcomes for hopitalized patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2017;69:21-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2016.11.005 PMid:27875713
  24. Muradali D, Goldberg DR US of gastrointestinal tract disease. Radiographics 2015;35:50-68 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.351140003 PMid:25590387
  25. Havre R, Giljs OH, Elastography and strain rate imaging of the gastrointestinal tract. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:438-441 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.018 PMid:23769191
  26. Gomollón F, Dignass A, Annese V 3rd European Evidence-based Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Crohn's Disease 2016: Part 1: Diagnosis and Medical Management. J Crohn Colitis. 2017: 11:3-25 https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw168 PMid:27660341
  27. Conti CB, Giunta M, Gridavilla D, Conte D, Fraquelli M Role of bowel ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with Crohn's disease. Ultrasound in Med and Biol 2017;43:725-734 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.12.014 PMid:28185694
  28. Migaleddu V, Quaia E, Scano D, Virgilio G Inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease: ultrasound findings. Abdom Imaging 2008;33:589-597 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9340-z PMid:18172707
  29. Biernacka CB, Baranska D, Grzelak P, Czkwianaianc E, Szabelska K Up-to-date overview of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology Rev 2019;14:19-25 https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2019.83423 PMid:30944674 PMCid:PMC6444107
  30. Imsirovic B, Zarem E, Gusa E Djedovic M, Cengic A et al Comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) enterography in evaluation of patients with Cronh's disease. Acta Inform Med 2018;26:93-97 https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.93-97 PMid:30061778 PMCid:PMC6029906
  31. Biernacka CB, Baranska D, Grzelak P, Czkwianaianc E, Szabelska K Up-to-date overview of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology Rev 2019;14:19-25 https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2019.83423 PMid:30944674 PMCid:PMC6444107
  32. Branchi F, Caprioli F, Orlando S, Conte D, Fraquelli M Non-invasive evaluation of intestinal disorders: the role of elastographic techniques. World J Gastroenterol 2017;23:2832-2840 https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i16.2832 PMid:28522902 PMCid:PMC5413779
  33. Roy CN Anaemia of inflammation. Haematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2010;276-280 https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2010.1.276 PMid:21239806
  34. Kario K, Matsuo T, Nakao K Serum erythropoietin levels in the elderly. Gerontology 1991;37:345-348 https://doi.org/10.1159/000213283 PMid:1765284
  35. Bruunsgaard H, Pedersen BK Age-related inflammatory cytokines and disease. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2003;23:15-39 https://doi.org/10.1159/000213283 PMid:1765284
  36. Martinez-Ares DS, Barrenechea I, Souto-Rouzo J, Yanez-LopezJ, Pallares Peral A, Vazquez-Iglesias JL The value of abdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of colon cancer. Rev Exp Enferm Dig 2005;97:877-886 https://doi.org/10.4321/S1130-01082005001200004
  37. Rutgeerts LJ, Vernbanck JJ, Carpe AW, Buyse BM, Ghillebert GL Detection of colorectal cancer by routine ultrasound. J Belge Radiol 1991;74:11-13
  38. Chang ST, Menias CO Imaging of primary gastrointestinal lymphoma. Semin Ultrasound 2013;34:558-65 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2013.05.008 PMid:24332207
  39. Annese V, Beaugerie L, Egan L et al. European Evidence-based Consensus: Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Malignancies. J Crohns Colitis 2015;9:945-65 https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv141 PMid:26294789
  40. Elli L, Norsa L, Zullo A et al Diagnosis of chronic anaemia in gastrointestinal disorders: A guideline by the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO) and the Italian Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (SIGENP). Dig Liver Dis 2019;51:471-483 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2019.01.022 PMid:30850345
  41. Nylund K, Maconi G, Hollerweger A et al EFSUMB Recommendations and Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound - Part 1: Examination Techniques and Normal Findings (Long version). Ultraschall in Med 2017;38: e1-e15 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-115853 PMid:27604052
  42. Soresi M, Mansueto P, Terranova A Abdominal Ultrasound Does Not Reveal Significant Alterations in Patients With Nonceliac Wheat Sensitivity. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019;53:e31-e36 https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000969 PMid:29206754
  43. Soresi M, Pirrone G, Giannitrapani L A key role for abdominal ultrasound examination in "difficult" diagnoses of celiac disease. Ultraschall Med 2011;32:S53-61 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1110009 PMid:20235005
  44. Frulloni L, Falconi M, Gabbrielli A Italian consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis. Dig Liver Dis 2010;42:S381-406 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1590-8658(10)60682-2
  45. Breymann C, Auerbarch M Iron deficiency in gynaecology and obstetrics: clinical implications and management. Hematology 2017;1:152-159 https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.152 PMid:29222250 PMCid:PMC6142528
  46. Murugandoss N, Coyle N, Dotta S Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology. Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine 2018;29:42-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2018.12.009
  47. Woodfield CA The usefulness of ultrasound imaging in gynaecologic oncology. PET Clin 2018;13:143-163 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2017.11.003 PMid:29482747
  48. Iraha Y, Okada M, Iraha R, Azama K, Yamashiro T CT and MR imaging of gynaecologic emergencies. Radiographics 2017;37:1569-1586 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160170 PMid:28753380
  49. Chiorean L, Cui XW, Kleen SA Clinical value of imaging for lymph nodes evaluation with particular emphasis on ultrasonography. Z Gastroenterol 2016;54:774-790 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108656 PMid:27529528
  50. Sharma A, Fidias P, Hayman LA, Loonis SL, Taber KH et al Patterns of lymphoadenopathy in thoracic malignancies. Radiographics 2004;24:419-434 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.242035075 PMid:15026591
  51. Vassallo P, Wernecke K, Roos N, Peters PE Differentiation of benign from malignant superficial lymphadenopathy: the role of high resolution US. Radiology 1992;183:215-220 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549675 PMid:1549675
  52. Yu M, Liu Q, Song HP, Han ZH, Su HL et al Clinical application of contrast enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of superficial lymphadenopathy. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29:735-740 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2010.29.5.735 PMid:20427785
  53. Dietrich CF Elastography applications. Endo Heute 2011;24:177-212 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262579
  54. Bachmann- Nielsen M, Saftoiou A Elastography, true or false? Ultraschall Med 2011;32:5-7 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1246008 PMid:21305435
  55. Trenker C, Gorg C, Jenssen C, Klein S, Neubauer A et al The role of abdominal ultrasound in haematological diseases. Z Gastroenterol 2018;56:1063-1076 https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0603-4240 PMid:30223283
  56. The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2016; 37:2129-2200 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128 PMid:27206819
  57. Maggioni AP EUR observational Research Programme. The heart failure pilot survey (ESH-HF Pilot). Eur J Heart Fail 2010;12(10):1076-1084 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfq154 PMid:20805094
  58. Tang YD, Katz SD The prevalence of anemia in chronic heart failure and its impact on clinical outcomes. Heart Fail Rev 2008;13:387-392 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-008-9089-7 PMid:18246424
  59. Amand IS Anaemia and chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52:501-511 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.044 PMid:18687241
  60. Hegde N, Rich MW, Gayomali C The cardiomiopathy of iron deficiency. Tex Heart Inst J 2006;33:340-344
  61. Datta BN, Silver MD, Cardiomegaly in chronic anaemia in rats and man experimental study including ultrastructural histometric and stereologic observations. Lab Invest 1975;32:503-514 https://doi.org/10.1080/00033797500200421
  62. Yoo RK Wook BP, Gil JS Relation of anaemia to echocardiographically estimated left ventricular filling pressure in hypertensive patients over 50 years old. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2010; 18:56-90 https://doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2010.18.3.86 PMid:20967155 PMCid:PMC2955338
  63. Tobili JE, Di Gennaro F, Rivas C Changes in echocardiographic parameters in iron deficiency patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease treated with intravenous iron. Heart Lung Circ 2015;24:686-695 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2014.12.161 PMid:25666998
  64. Sutil-Vega M, Rizzo M, Martinez-Rubio A. Anaemia and iron deficiency in heart failure: a review of echocardiographic features. Echocardiography 2019 https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.14271 PMid:30693550
  65. Shen J, Zhou Q, Liu Y, Runlan L, Li T Evaluation of left atrial function in patients with iron-deficiency anaemia by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2016:14:34-43  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-016-0078-z PMid:27550185 PMCid:PMC4994319  
  66. In-Jeong C, Yeung CM, Ki HK, Gil JS Effect of anaemia correction on left ventricular structure and filling pressure in anaemic patients without overt heart disease. Korean J Intern Med 2014;29:445-453 https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2014.29.4.445  PMid:25045292 PMCid:PMC4101591
  67. Venneri L, Zoppellaro G, Khattar RS Cardio-oncology: the role of advanced echocardiography in cancer patients. Expert Rev of Cardiovasc Ther 2018;16:249-258 https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2018.1443394 PMid:29457984
  68. Plana JC, Galderisi M, Barac A Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy. A report form the American Society of Echocardiography and the European association of Cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:1063-1093 https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu192 PMid:25239940 PMCid:PMC4402366
  69. Mozzini C, Cominacini L, Casadei A, Schiavone C, Soresi M Ultrasonography in heart failure: a story that matters. Curr Probl Cardiol 2019;44:116-136 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2018.05.003 PMid:30172551
  70. Dietrich CF, Hoffmann B, Cantisani V et al Medical student ultrasound education: A WFUMB position paper, Part I. Ultrasound Med Biol 2019;45:271-281 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.09.017 PMid:30497768