Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases

Original Articles

Association of Baseline Platelet Count with Complete Remission, Severe Bleeding, and 24-Month Overall Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Tao Zhou1, Zengfeng Ni2, Wenjing Fan1, Jing Xu3, Jing Qin1, Kaiyue Wang1, Rui Wang1 and Yaping Li1.

1 Department of Hematology, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, No. 777, Xitai Road, Gaoxin District, Xi'an 712000, Shaanxi Province, China.

2 Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical University, No. 48, Fenghao West Road, Lianhu District, Xi'an 710000, Shaanxi Province, China.

3 Department of Hematology, Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital, No. 16, Tuanjie South Road, Gaoxin District, Xi'an City, Shaanxi Province, China.

Supplementary Files

Supplementary Figure 1. Three-knot restricted cubic spline analyses. Adjusted three-knot RCS associations of baseline platelet count with (A) severe bleeding (primary analysis, n=231, excluding patients with bleeding at diagnosis) and (B) 24-month OS (n=356). For severe bleeding, the overall association was not statistically significant (P=0.218) with no evidence of non-linearity (P=0.130). For 24-month OS, the overall association was statistically significant (P<0.001) and approximately linear (non-linearity P=0.069). Shaded areas show 95% CIs. The severe-bleeding RCS was adjusted for DIC and induction treatment class; the OS RCS was adjusted for age, WBC, bone marrow blasts, cytogenetic risk, induction class, ECOG, and AML type.

Supplementary Figure 2. Martingale-residual diagnostics for WBC functional form. Martingale residuals from the 24-month Cox model excluding WBC plotted against (A) WBC on the original scale and (B) log(WBC+0.1). Red curves represent loess smoothers; dashed horizontal lines indicate zero. Mild curvature was observed at higher WBC values, but formal specification tests did not reject the linear form (likelihood-ratio P=0.0996; spline nonlinear-component P=0.0779).

Supplementary Table 1. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of severe bleeding (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) in the full cohort (sensitivity analysis, n=356, 61 events).

VariableTypeOR95% CIP value
PLT group (Low vs. Normal/High)Univariable

3.044

1.555–5.962

0.001

WBC, × 10⁹/LUnivariable

1.017

1.011–1.024

<0.001
DIC: No (vs. Yes)Univariable

0.260

0.133–0.509

<0.001
HMA+VEN (vs. intensive)Univariable

2.401

1.258–4.582

0.008

Other regimen (vs. intensive)Univariable

1.673

0.636–4.402

0.297

ECOG ≥2 (vs. 0–1)Univariable

2.344

1.321–4.158

0.004

Secondary/therapy-related AMLUnivariable

2.028

1.054–3.902

0.034

PLT group (Low vs. Normal/High)Multivariable

2.753

1.318–5.749

0.007

WBC, × 10⁹/LMultivariable

1.018

1.010–1.025

<0.001
DIC: No (vs. Yes)Multivariable

0.335

0.156–0.721

0.005

HMA+VEN (vs. intensive)Multivariable

2.875

1.370–6.034

0.005

Other regimen (vs. intensive)Multivariable

2.729

0.926–8.042

0.069

ECOG ≥2 (vs. 0–1)Multivariable

2.579

1.324–5.024

0.005

Secondary/therapy-related AMLMultivariable

2.065

0.961–4.433

0.063

This sensitivity analysis used the original severe-bleeding endpoint (all 356 patients, 61 events) and removed the baseline-bleeding covariate to avoid circularity with the outcome. The model additionally included ECOG performance status and AML type. Low baseline platelet count was associated with severe bleeding (adjusted OR=2.753, 95% CI 1.318–5.749, P=0.007). Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HMA+VEN, hypomethylating agent plus venetoclax.

Supplementary Table 2. Comparison of baseline characteristics between patients censored before 24 months and those with adequate follow-up.

VariableCensored <24m (n=88)Adequate follow-up (n=268)P valueSMD
Age, years

50.7±13.6

54.6±13.0

0.018

0.292

WBC, × 10⁹/L

61.8±40.6

57.2±39.9

0.347

0.115

Hb, g/L

78.2±18.7

78.2±19.9

0.998

0.000

Baseline PLT, × 10⁹/L

59.9±48.0

55.4±44.0

0.417

0.098

BM blast, %

58.8±16.7

60.0±17.5

0.585

0.068

LDH, U/L

519.8±229.3

513.5±220.2

0.820

0.028

Fibrinogen, g/L

2.6±0.9

2.4±0.9

0.059

0.236

D-dimer, mg/L

5.0±3.1

5.4±2.9

0.234

0.145

Early-censored patients were younger than those with adequate follow-up (50.7 vs. 54.6 years, P=0.018). No other baseline characteristics differed significantly (all P>0.05). Abbreviations: WBC, white blood cell count; Hb, hemoglobin; PLT, platelet count; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; FIB, fibrinogen; DDimer, D-dimer; SMD, standardized mean difference.

Supplementary Table 3. Common-outcome scenario analyses for the association of low baseline platelet count with 24-month overall survival.

ScenarioHR95% CIP (Cox)P (log-rank)NEvents
Common-outcome: all-censored died

2.012

1.472–2.750

<0.001<0.001356194
Common-outcome: all-censored survived

2.276

1.469–3.526

<0.001<0.001356106

Common-outcome scenario: all-censored died assumed all 88 patients censored before 24 months died within 24 months (HR=2.012, 95% CI 1.472–2.750, P<0.001). Common-outcome scenario: all-censored survived assumed they all survived to 24 months (HR=2.276, 95% CI 1.469–3.526, P<0.001). Both common-outcome scenarios produced hazard ratios in the same direction as the primary analysis; however, these scenarios do not address differential informative censoring between platelet groups.

Supplementary Table 4. Sensitivity analysis restricted to patients receiving intensive induction (DA or IA regimens, n=264).

AnalysisOR/HR95% CIP valueNEvents
Severe bleeding (primary endpoint)

1.821

0.462–10.038

0.407

1749
24-month OS

2.402

1.273–4.532

0.007

26467

In patients receiving intensive induction, low baseline platelet count was associated with 24-month overall survival (adjusted HR=2.402, 95% CI 1.273–4.532, P=0.007; 67 deaths). The severe-bleeding association was not statistically significant in this subgroup (OR=1.821, 95% CI 0.462–10.038, P=0.407; n=174, 9 events). Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Supplementary Table 5. Center and calendar-period sensitivity analyses.

AnalysisEffect measureOR/HR95% CIP valueNEvents
Center-adjusted 24-month OSHR

1.896

1.192–3.017

0.007

356106
Center × PLT-group interaction for 24-month OSInteraction P

0.186

356106
2020–2022: 24-month OSHR

1.614

0.975–2.672

0.063

27988
2023–2025: 24-month OSHR

3.048

0.880–10.560

0.079

7718
2020–2022: severe bleedingOR

1.253

0.413–4.178

0.696

18116
2023–2025: severe bleedingOR

4.994

0.419–1385.252

0.224

504

The center-adjusted model added participating center to the prespecified 24-month Cox model. The interaction P value tests whether the platelet-group association varied by center; a non-significant result does not prove homogeneity. Calendar-period analyses were exploratory. Estimates for severe bleeding, particularly in 2023–2025 (4 events), were highly imprecise and should not be interpreted as evidence of no association. OR, odds ratio; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; OS, overall survival; PLT, platelet count.