Long-term persistence of dysplastic features in patients with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia treated with all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide.
Main Article Content
Keywords
dysplasia, acute promyelocytic leukemia, arsenic trioxide
Abstract
The introduction of arsenic trioxid (ATO) associated to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is the therapeutic standard for standard-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). ATO has been shown to induce dysplastic changes on bone marrow progenitor cells. Despite that, observational studies evaluating bone marrow morphology during follow-up of APL patients treated with the ATRA-ATO combination are lacking. Hence, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate morphological characteristics of bone marrow smears at different time-points during the follow up of 8 patients successfully treated with ATRA-ATO (end of consolidaton and 12 monts after end of therapy), as compared to those of 3 patients treated with the AIDA protocol. At 12 months after end of treatment, we highlighted higher grade of megakaryocytic dysplasia and increased promonocyte counts in patients treated with ATRA/ATO versus AIDA (p=0.026 and p=0.030 respectively), suggesting a long-term dysplastic effect of arsenic trioxide. Despite the morphological alterations described, none of the patients treated with ATRA-ATO developed cytopenia or a secondary myeloid neoplasm during follow-up, configuring an “idiopathic dysplasia of unknown significance” (IDUS).
Downloads
Abstract 18
PDF Downloads 6
HTML Downloads 2
References
[2] U. Platzbecker et al., ‘Improved Outcomes With Retinoic Acid and Arsenic Trioxide Compared With Retinoic Acid and Chemotherapy in Non-High-Risk Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Final Results of the Randomized Italian-German APL0406 Trial.’, J Clin Oncol, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 605–612, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1982.
[3] L. Cicconi et al., ‘Long-term results of all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide in non-high-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia: update of the APL0406 Italian-German randomized trial.’, Leukemia, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 914–918, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0589-3.
[4] M. T. Voso et al., ‘Acute promyelocytic leukemia: long-term outcomes from the HARMONY project.’, Blood, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 234–243, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1182/blood.2024026186.
[5] K. P. Miller et al., ‘Bone Marrow Findings in Patients With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Treated With Arsenic Trioxide.’, Am J Clin Pathol, vol. 152, no. 5, pp. 675–685, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz087.
[6] G. Avvisati et al., ‘AIDA (all-trans retinoic acid + idarubicin) in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia: a Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell’Adulto (GIMEMA) pilot study.’, Blood, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1390–8, Aug. 1996.
[7] J. W. Vardiman et al., ‘The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes.’, Blood, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 937–51, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262.
[8] M. G. Della Porta et al., ‘Minimal morphological criteria for defining bone marrow dysplasia: a basis for clinical implementation of WHO classification of myelodysplastic syndromes.’, Leukemia, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 66–75, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.161.
[9] P. Valent et al., ‘Idiopathic bone marrow dysplasia of unknown significance (IDUS): definition, pathogenesis, follow up, and prognosis.’, Am J Cancer Res, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 531–41, 2011.
[10] R. Latagliata et al., ‘Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome-acute myelogenous leukemia in patients treated for acute promyelocytic leukemia: an emerging problem.’, Blood, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 822–4, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.3.822.
[11] I. Lobe et al., ‘Myelodysplastic syndrome after acute promyelocytic leukemia: the European APL group experience.’, Leukemia, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1600–4, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403034.
[12] A. Eghtedar et al., ‘Incidence of secondary neoplasms in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans retinoic acid plus chemotherapy or with all-trans retinoic acid plus arsenic trioxide.’, Leuk Lymphoma, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1342–5, May 2015, doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.953143.
[13] Z. Wang et al., ‘[Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms after successful treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia: a report of four cases and literature review].’, Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1008–1014, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.12.007.
[14] P. Montesinos et al., ‘Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans-retinoic Acid and anthracycline-based chemotherapy.’, J Clin Oncol, vol. 28, no. 24, pp. 3872–9, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.2268.
[15] D. Gaut, J. Sasine, and G. Schiller, ‘Secondary clonal hematologic neoplasia following successful therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): A report of two cases and review of the literature.’, Leuk Res Rep, vol. 9, pp. 65–71, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.lrr.2018.04.005.
[16] F. Efficace et al., ‘Long-term quality of life of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with arsenic trioxide vs chemotherapy.’, Blood Adv, vol. 5, no. 21, pp. 4370–4379, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004649.
[17] M. A. Sanz et al., ‘Management of acute promyelocytic leukemia: updated recommendations from an expert panel of the European LeukemiaNet.’, Blood, vol. 133, no. 15, pp. 1630–1643, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-01-894980.
[18] D. Westhoff, R. Samaha, and A. J. Barnes, ‘Arsenic intoxication as a cause of megaloblastic anemia’, Blood, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 241–246, Feb. 1975, doi: 10.1182/blood.V45.2.241.241.
[19] H. Pralle and F. Manz, ‘Influence of chronic arsenic poisoning on bone marrow morphology’, Blut, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 51–54, Jan. 1985, doi: 10.1007/BF00319771.
[20] J. Feussner, J. Shelburne, S. Bredehoeft, and H. Cohen, ‘Arsenic-induced bone marrow toxicity: ultrastructural and electron- probe analysis’, Blood, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 820–827, May 1979, doi: 10.1182/blood.V53.5.820.820.